Peer-Reviewed
Published in the Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Traditional screening tools force you to pre-judge which condition to test for. You pick ONE tool — PHQ-9 for depression, GAD-7 for anxiety — and hope you guessed right. But what if the patient has something you didn't think to look for?
of behavioral health conditions in primary care go unidentified
Cerimele et al., General Hospital Psychiatry, 2014; Mitchell et al., The Lancet, 2009negative predictive power
In a peer-reviewed study of 234 patients across 5 primary care practices, Connected Mind's screening achieved 96.4% negative predictive power — meaning when the screen says a patient is clear, it's right 96.4% of the time.
Individual results may vary based on patient population, clinical context, and implementation.
View Springer Study →A patient comes in complaining of fatigue and difficulty concentrating.
What screening tool do you reach for?
Or explore the site: Features, Science, Pricing, Billing Guides
I have everything I need to make a plan before I go into the exam room.
Dr. Gustavo Day, MD
Individual results may vary
Connected Mind identified issues in my patients that I would have completely missed with standard screening.
Amy Doneen, DNP
Individual results may vary
The branching logic means my patients only answer questions relevant to their symptoms. It respects their time and mine.
Dr. Derek LeJeune, MD
Individual results may vary
Start screening for 6 conditions simultaneously. Setup takes minutes.